Rabelais is brief

Pinsky L. TURNING, - April, Paris] - French. In the youth, R. these classes brought to him persecution by ignorant. Grad, with the permission of Papa R., the years of wanderings in the university cities of France and its shopping centers, which enriched R., studied the right in Poitiers, medicine in Montpellier, where he was awarded the degree of bachelors, later-the Dr.

Medicine, had great success here, had his lectures, characteristic of the humanist.

As a doctor R. Portrait of the French School of Lit. Then, as a continuation of one popular novel about the giants who was a huge success, the first Nedtirov came out. Alcofribas Name Anagram from Francois Rabelais. The frank and impudent freedom of the novel “Third Book”, “The Fourth Book”, met by contemporaries with enthusiasm of 11 lifetime ed. Each book by R. patrons R. Du Bella, he was a personal doctor of which.

Guille Du Bella, at one time the governor of the king in Piedmont, served as the ruler with a prototype for the “good Pantagruel” “Third Book”; In the retinue of Jean Du Bella, the Parisian Bishop later Cardinal, R. In the castle of the cardinal, the Fourth Book was added. In the cardinal, Du Belle began for R. shortly before his death, he refused both parishes. Authenticity The authenticity of the posthumous “Fifth Book of Pantagruel” in our time is almost unanimously rejected by criticism; It was created unknown.

With all the variety of humanistic. But this book is an encyclopedic. Revival, religion. This is the production. The universal laughter over the obsolete world in the spirit of the “praise of stupidity” preserved the enthusiastic letter of R. for unbridled science fiction and seemingly chaotic. R. himself the concept of R. Marx K. artistically is embodied in the “Pantagryel” “all-terrifying” naturals of his heroes-giants and their company, in the parallelism of “wine” and “knowledge”, two leitmotifs, which mean bodily and spiritual liberation of the personality, “hence the materialization of the spiritual, the spiritualization of the material-the form of the comic-the form of the comic-the form of the comic-the form of the comic-the form of the comic For art.

This concept is permeated and the formation of R. all the hostile nature of the “creatures of the antiphysis”, in the language of R. comic of the unnatural - this is all kinds of inertness, self -custrteism, dumb pre -dogmatics, fanaticism - grotes -out maniacs who have fallen out of consciousness that are the exaggeration of consciousness - the beloved technique of R.

The episodic "transient" characters and isolated "islands" serve to be inquisitive. In the homeland, F. engraving is also, but differently, the main grotesque, passing through all the narrative, heroes; The natural is revealed in them. The basis of the grotesque here is the dynamism of life, the growth to the fantastic. Individualization of types in R. Cervantes, W. Shakespeare are marked with interest in the maximum, in the “ceiling” of self -development of nature, at the same time universally human and individually characteristic.

Already the names of the two central and opposite in the nature of the heroes indicate the versatility of Pantagruel - “omnivorous”, Panurg - “everything is possible”, “dodger”; Panurg - “But Pantagruel is not the“ representative ”of the humanism of the Renaissance, but as if the humanistic itself. More specifically-Panurg “personifies the people” see Panurg’s eternal “questions” and doubts about the answers given to him in the last three books and the plot of the trip in search of truth, i.e.

R.'s condescension to the ideal “good kings” of R. Pantagruel is contrasted with “demo-soldiers”, the absorption of the people state, identified by the people who are identified ruler of the--state. The denial of R. is characteristic of R. The source of laughter R. In general, the laughter of R. is far from the humor, which hits between comic and sad; The laughter of R. is multi -significant in shades, but always peppy, joyful, “purely comic”, festive laughter, as in the antique “komos” “walking company of mummers” at the festivities of Dionysus; eternal nar.

But laughter, according to the Dr. Medicine R., after Aristotle R., the laughter indicates a clear spiritual vision and gives him; “Freeing from all affects”, pestamous consciousness, laughter plays a “therapeutic” role to know life. Glory to R. Contemporaries testify to the popular popularity of R. But already for the 17th century. Lafontaine, Moliere, masters of burlesque genres.

Voltaire, a letter to Dudeffan from the true cult of R. Chateaubriend, in the book. Hugo as an ideal grotesque put forward by romantics as a leading principle for modern. For Balzac, Rabelais is the greatest mind of humanity of the New Age “cousin Pon”. From the 2nd floor. Stapper, E. Zhebar, in Russia Alexander N. Veselovsky sought to establish the historical and cultural significance of Roman R.

R. The “Society for the Study of Rabelais” was organized, led by A., 31 monumental, but brought only to the “third book” richly commented critic. Many research is devoted to the textology of J. Bulange, topography A. Kluzo, biographical. Lefran, the language of R. Senean, his biography, the final work of J. Platar, the sources of ideas and the enormous erudition of Platar, the influence of R.

was given less attention in the 20th century. Lepran like -minded people do not attach much importance to the Rabelazian laughter, evaluating it as a “disguise” see Lefranc, Rabelais, P.Plattard, Fr. Rabelais, P. taken outside the specifically artistic form, the idea of ​​R. in the entire depth of the crisis of modern. Researcher of the 20th century Lefevra, trusting his sense of comic, reading R.

in the monograph by M. Bakhtin substantiated a new interpretation of Roman Roman R. R. R. R. R. in Russia, the popularity of R. Engelhardt is completely unsatisfactory. In the abbreviated translation of V., the latest translation of N. Lyubimov, one of the highest achievements of Translatch. Lefranc [e.